Vs > Lower Hutt, Gracefield
| Kandahar vs Lower Hutt, Gracefield Climate & Distance Between | |
Kandahar vs Poltava, Ukraine
Kandahar vs Arica, Chile
Kandahar vs Zamiin-Uud, Mongolia
Kandahar vs Aldan, Russia
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Port Angeles, Wa, Usa
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Bismarck, North Dakota, Usa
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Vlore, Albania
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Las Vegas, Nevada, Usa
Sulina vs Shizuoka
Cork (Ap) vs Msekera Agromet
Fullertonese, Nd vs Belfast-Aldergrove
Vasilevici vs Chitedze
- The distance between Kandahar, Afghanistan and Lower Hutt, Gracefield, New Zealand is approximately 13,747 km or 8,542 mi.
- To reach Kandahar in this distance one would set out from Lower Hutt, Gracefield bearing 284.6° or WNW and follow the great circles arc to approach Kandahar bearing 301.4° or WNW .
- Kandahar has a subtropical hot steppe climate (BSh) whereas Lower Hutt, Gracefield has a marine west coast climate (Cfb).
- Kandahar is in or near the warm temperate desert scrub biome whereas Lower Hutt, Gracefield is in or near the warm temperate thorn steppe biome.
- The annual mean temperature is 5.4 °C (9.7°F) warmer.
- Average monthly temperatures vary by 18.2 °C (32.8°F) more in Kandahar. The continentality subtype is subcontinental as opposed to barely hyperoceanic.
- Total annual precipitation averages 1125 mm (44.3 in) less which is equivalent to 1125 l/m² (27.61 US gal/ft²) or 11,250,000 l/ha (1,202,700 US gal/ac) less. About 1/7 as much.
- The altitude of the sun at midday is overall 10.4° higher in Kandahar than in Lower Hutt, Gracefield.
Climate Comparison Table
The table shows values for Kandahar relative to Lower Hutt, Gracefield. You can also view this comparison the other way around from the perspective of Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Kandahar.
| |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
Annual |
| Average Temperature °C ( °F) |
-12 (-22) |
-10 (-17) |
-2 (-4) |
+6 (+11) |
+14 (+25) |
+20 (+37) |
+23 (+42) |
+20 (+36) |
+13 (+23) |
+5 (+9) |
-3 (-6) |
-9 (-15) |
|
+5 (+10) |
| Average Precipitation mm (in) |
-20 (-1) |
-20 (-1) |
-51 (-2) |
-93 (-4) |
-135 (-5) |
-142 (-6) |
-156 (-6) |
-139 (-5) |
-114 (-4) |
-96 (-4) |
-81 (-3) |
-80 (-3) |
|
-1125 (-44) |
| Average Daylight Hours & Minutes/ Day |
-4h 24' |
-2h 44' |
-0h 30' |
+1h 53' |
+3h 54' |
+4h 56' |
+4h 28' |
+2h 44' |
+0h 25' |
-1h 57' |
-3h 57' |
-4h 56' |
|
0h 00' |
| Sun altitude at solar noon on the 21st day (°) |
-30 |
-11.5 |
+10.1 |
+33.4 |
+50 |
+56.5 |
+50.6 |
+34 |
+11.2 |
-11.5 |
-29.9 |
-37.1 |
| +10.4 |
There are so many comparison pages. Please post a link to one to help people find them:
Kandahar vs Sioux City, Ia, Usa
Kandahar vs Havana, Cuba
Kandahar vs Vientiane, Laos
Kandahar vs Pontianak, Borneo, Indonesia
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Ammassalik, Greenland
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Nikopol’, Ukraine
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Den Helder, Netherlands
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Hoseda-Hard, Russia
Skikda vs Gemert
Whatawhata vs Taiyuan
Greensboro, Nc vs Yarmouth, Ns
Victoria, Tx vs San Rafael
Kandahar vs Lower Hutt, Gracefield Discussion
You are welcome to incorporate your thoughts on the differences in climate or other matters such as contrasts in culture, standard of living, demographics etc.
|